galih-pratama
A quarter of a century after the catastrophic terrorist strikes of September 11, 2001, the international community continues to examine the enduring legacy of a day that fundamentally reshaped modern global affairs. Twenty-five years later, analysts, leaders, and citizens face the enduring question of whether the memory of the coordinated assaults on New York City, the Pentagon, and Pennsylvania is gradually fading into history, or whether it remains as vivid and raw as it was on that sunny late-summer morning.
Commemorations in the United States have once again underscored the profound human loss associated with the tragedy. In New York, Mayor Zohran Mamdani attended an official memorial service hosted by the Fire Department of the City of New York on Staten Island. The event, held ahead of the milestone twenty-fifth anniversary, paid solemn tribute to the emergency responders and victims who perished in the devastation of the World Trade Center.
The September 11 attacks constituted a singular, generational catastrophe that blindsided the entire planet. Hijacked commercial jetliners destroyed the Twin Towers in lower Manhattan, struck the Pentagon outside the nation's capital, and crashed into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. The unprecedented destruction left thousands of civilians dead on American soil and fundamentally disrupted international expectations of peace and security.
These enduring geopolitical consequences served as the central focus of a special broadcast on France 24’s flagship current affairs programme, "The Debate." Coordinated and produced by a media team comprising François Picard, Maya Yataghène, Juliette Laffont, Ilayda Habip, and Andrew Hilliar, the broadcast examined how the historical shockwaves of 2001 continue to intersect with modern governance, defense priorities, and international relations.
When the attacks took place in 2001, the international order was still navigating the complex aftermath of the Cold War. Western foreign policy and defense establishments had spent decades focused on traditional state rivalries, leaving governments largely unprepared for the sudden emergence of highly organized, catastrophic violence perpetrated by non-state actors.
This strategic surprise precipitated an abrupt and comprehensive pivot within Western intelligence agencies. Security personnel and operatives who had spent their careers focusing on Soviet strategy and learning the Russian language were suddenly required to take intensive Arabic courses to counter non-state militant networks across the Middle East.
The intelligence overhaul highlighted the immense psychological and strategic shock of having thousands of individuals killed on United States soil by decentralized terrorist organizations. The vulnerability exposed that morning permanently altered domestic security protocols, international border management, and surveillance practices across the globe.
Over the intervening decades, each major anniversary milestone has served as a distinct indicator of the specific global tensions and challenges defining that era. The retrospective examinations highlight how every subsequent period has reframed the memory of the original attacks through its own prevailing international crises.
Ten years ago, on the fifteenth anniversary of the tragedy, the global focus was dominated by the immediate aftermath of major terrorist strikes in Paris and the violent expansion of the Islamic State group. At that juncture, the international community was heavily preoccupied with combating the militant organization's drive to establish a territorial caliphate across Iraq and Syria.
Five years later, the twentieth anniversary arrived during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. At that stage, the entire planet was suddenly confronted with an unforeseen, universal health crisis that disrupted international travel, public assemblies, and daily life, temporarily overshadowing traditional security concerns with a shared biological threat.
To analyze how the contemporary world informs the memory of the attacks, France 24 assembled a panel of distinguished international specialists. Among the guests was Craig Copetas, a columnist with Türkiye Today, who shared insights into the long-term regional consequences of Western foreign policy decisions implemented following the 2001 tragedy.
Academic and geopolitical analysis was provided by Karim Emile Bitar, a professor representing both Saint Joseph University of Beirut and Sciences Po Paris. Bitar discussed the evolving relationship between the Middle East and Western nations, highlighting how shifting political dynamics have reshaped regional diplomacy over the last two and a half decades.
The discussion also drew upon the legal expertise of Reed Brody, a former New York State Assistant Attorney General. Brody provided detailed perspectives on the legal frameworks, human rights debates, and institutional policies that were developed or challenged in response to the post-9/11 counterterrorism landscape.
Completing the expert panel was Jocelyne Cesari, the Chair of Religion and Politics at the University of Birmingham. Cesari provided vital analysis regarding the sociopolitical intersection of faith, governance, and public perception, reviewing how cultural narratives have evolved since the initial aftermath of the 2001 strikes.
The panel emphasized that the current international landscape is defined by a complex paradox: while societies are more digitally connected and plugged-in than ever before, the global order is simultaneously experiencing heightened fragmentation. Strategic alignments are increasingly unstable, with the traditional balance of power between historical allies and geopolitical competitors remaining in a state of ongoing flux.
Ultimately, twenty-five years of reflection demonstrate that the lessons derived from September 11 remain profoundly consequential. As contemporary nations confront an increasingly fractured global landscape, understanding how historical shocks continue to drive modern foreign policy remains essential for navigating international security in the twenty-first century.
Comments (0)